EnergyFather vs NETTS
The two are a long way apart at 65k energy for one hour: NETTS is 55% below EnergyFather, which is 1.56 TRX on one rental. Every price on this page comes from our own scan of EnergyFather and NETTS, and the tables refresh from the newest scan as the page opens.
Every term, EnergyFather against NETTS
| Package | EnergyFather (TRX) | NETTS (TRX) | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65k · 1 hour | 2.86 | 1.30 | NETTS −55% |
| 65k · 1 day | ≈ 3.92 | ≈ 1.78 | NETTS ≈−55% |
| 65k · 3 days | ≈ 8.26 | ≈ 3.75 | NETTS ≈−55% |
| 65k · 10 days | — | ≈ 12.14 | NETTS only |
| 130k · 1 hour | ≈ 5.72 | 2.62 | NETTS ≈−54% |
| 130k · 1 day | ≈ 7.84 | ≈ 3.59 | NETTS ≈−54% |
| 130k · 3 days | ≈ 16.51 | ≈ 7.56 | NETTS ≈−54% |
| 130k · 10 days | — | ≈ 24.47 | NETTS only |
≈ — estimated from market ratios, not a quoted price.
Live prices as of 2026-10-24 02:29 UTC.
So which is cheaper, EnergyFather or NETTS?
The short answer is NETTS at 1.30 TRX. EnergyFather wants 2.86 TRX for the same 65k energy for one hour, 55 more, and nothing further down the EnergyFather and NETTS ladder reverses that.
Price is the only thing this board ranks on. A gap of 55% is a gap in TRX and nothing else, and it says nothing about how EnergyFather or NETTS handle an order that goes wrong.
Where EnergyFather and NETTS sit on the whole board
Against the whole board, EnergyFather is 11th and NETTS is joint 1st of the 19 platforms that quoted this package. 10 places separates them, so the pair is not a two-horse race so much as two points on a longer list.
Both of those positions rest on prices EnergyFather and NETTS publish themselves, not on anything this board has inferred, and both move whenever any other platform changes its rate.
What the archive has on EnergyFather and NETTS
Over the 621 scans in which both quoted 65k energy for one hour, NETTS was the cheaper of the two on every single one. The lead never changed hands.
The average distance between them while both were quoting was 1.25 TRX. The widest it opened was 1.56 TRX, at 2026-10-24 02:15 UTC. The movement was one sided: EnergyFather held 2.86 TRX at every one of the 621 scans and NETTS moved 38 times, between 1.30 and 2.21 TRX.
None of that is a trend. The board has been recording since 2026-09-24 02:00 UTC, every 15 minutes, and the archive behind this page is 720 hours of data so far. It is long enough to say what EnergyFather and NETTS did yesterday and too short to say what either of them usually does.
What separates EnergyFather from NETTS
EnergyFather and NETTS quote the same terms but not at the same sizes. NETTS puts a real number against 65k and 130k energy only, so its column is worked out from market ratios, while EnergyFather publishes both sizes. That is six inferred rows for NETTS against five for EnergyFather.
Neither EnergyFather nor NETTS will rent for 15 minutes. An hour is the shortest thing either of them sells, and the 15 minute row is empty on both sides of the table above for that reason.
NETTS is the one of the two that states its order limits: a floor of 32,000 energy and a ceiling of 5,000,000 energy. EnergyFather publishes no minimum and no maximum we can read, so the size of order it will take is not something this page can tell you.
Our scraper carries a note against EnergyFather that changes how its column should be read: “EnergyFather's API documents six rental periods: one hour, and 1, 3, 7, 15 and 30 days. Ten days is not one of them. Their public price endpoint quotes the hourly rate only, and their order form shows a visitor no day option, so the hour is the one term the board can price here. We read it from the public endpoint they asked us to use, and it returns the same number an order would.” That is why the EnergyFather figure beside NETTS is the one it charges anyone walking up, not the lowest number it advertises.
Our scraper carries a note against NETTS that changes how its column should be read: “NETTS sells by the hour and by the day, up to 30 days, but the only price it publishes outside its own interface is the hourly one. The hour here is their number; the day columns are the board's estimate, because their day rate is quoted only inside their own order form.” That is why the NETTS figure beside EnergyFather is the one it charges anyone walking up, not the lowest number it advertises.
Both EnergyFather and NETTS pay us a commission when someone signs up through our link, which is why the two buttons at the foot of this page are marked as sponsored. It buys neither of them a place on the board.
NETTS carries a Telegram bot, a marketplace and automatic top-ups and EnergyFather does not. Both of them run a public API.
Features
| Feature | EnergyFather | NETTS |
|---|---|---|
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram | No | Yes |
| Marketplace | No | Yes |
| Auto-topup | No | Yes |
| Pay in USDT | Not checked | Yes |
Order limits
| Limit | EnergyFather | NETTS |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum order | no limit stated | 32,000 energy |
| Maximum order | no limit stated | 5,000,000 energy |
| Platform pool cap | no limit stated | no limit stated |
Go to
Our links to EnergyFather and NETTS are referral links: they pay us, you pay the same price.