APITRX vs FeeSaver
APITRX and FeeSaver sit close together at 65k energy for one hour, 8% apart, which is 0.23 TRX on a single rental. Every price on this page comes from our own scan of APITRX and FeeSaver, and the tables refresh from the newest scan as the page opens.
Every term, APITRX against FeeSaver
| Package | APITRX (TRX) | FeeSaver (TRX) | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65k · 15 minutes | — | ≈ 2.58 | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 1 hour | 2.50 | 2.73 | APITRX −8% |
| 65k · 1 day | ≈ 3.42 | ≈ 3.74 | APITRX ≈−9% |
| 65k · 3 days | ≈ 7.22 | ≈ 7.88 | APITRX ≈−8% |
| 130k · 15 minutes | — | ≈ 5.16 | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 1 hour | 5.00 | ≈ 5.46 | APITRX ≈−8% |
| 130k · 1 day | ≈ 6.85 | ≈ 7.48 | APITRX ≈−8% |
| 130k · 3 days | ≈ 14.44 | ≈ 15.76 | APITRX ≈−8% |
≈ — estimated from market ratios, not a quoted price.
Live prices as of 2026-10-24 02:29 UTC.
So which is cheaper, APITRX or FeeSaver?
The short answer is APITRX at 2.50 TRX. FeeSaver wants 2.73 TRX for the same 65k energy for one hour, 8 more, and nothing further down the APITRX and FeeSaver ladder reverses that.
Price is the only thing this board ranks on, and 8% is a thin margin to choose on, so the rest of this page sets out what else separates APITRX from FeeSaver without scoring either of them.
Where APITRX and FeeSaver sit on the whole board
APITRX sits 8th and FeeSaver 10th among the 19 platforms with a price for 65k energy for one hour. Neither position is fixed, and 2 places is easily covered by one platform changing its rate.
Both of those positions rest on prices APITRX and FeeSaver publish themselves, not on anything this board has inferred, and both move whenever any other platform changes its rate.
What the archive has on APITRX and FeeSaver
Over the 508 scans in which both quoted 65k energy for one hour, APITRX was the cheaper of the two on every single one. The lead never changed hands.
The average distance between them while both were quoting was 0.23 TRX. The widest it opened was 0.23 TRX, at 2026-10-24 02:15 UTC. Neither price moved in that window: APITRX held 2.50 TRX at every one of the 509 scans and FeeSaver held 2.73 TRX at every one of the 620 scans, which is why the gap above is the same number from end to end.
None of that is a trend. The board has been recording since 2026-09-24 02:00 UTC, every 15 minutes, and the archive behind this page is 720 hours of data so far. It is long enough to say what APITRX and FeeSaver did yesterday and too short to say what either of them usually does.
What separates APITRX from FeeSaver
APITRX and FeeSaver quote the same terms but not at the same sizes. FeeSaver puts a real number against 65k energy only, so its 130k column is worked out from market ratios, while APITRX publishes both sizes. That is seven inferred rows for FeeSaver against four for APITRX.
Neither APITRX nor FeeSaver publishes an order size limit that our scraper can read, so the order limits table that appears on some head to head pages is absent from this one.
Our scraper carries a note against APITRX that changes how its column should be read: “Telegram-bot and API orders start from 1.1 TRX per hour (member pricing); the board shows the plain-transfer price. Pay-per-transfer mode: 2,2 TRX per USDT transfer.” That is why the APITRX figure beside FeeSaver is the one it charges anyone walking up, not the lowest number it advertises.
One of these two pays us and the other does not: our FeeSaver link is a referral link, our APITRX link is a plain one. The prices are read the same way for both, and APITRX outranking FeeSaver on this page would cost us money without changing a line of it.
FeeSaver carries a Telegram bot and APITRX does not. Both of them run a public API and automatic top-ups.
Features
| Feature | APITRX | FeeSaver |
|---|---|---|
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram | No | Yes |
| Auto-topup | Yes | Yes |
Order limits
Go to
Our link to FeeSaver is a referral link: they pay us, you pay the same price. APITRX pays us nothing.