FeeSaver vs TR Energy
Every package FeeSaver and TR Energy did report is in the table below, side by side, at the sizes and terms each of them sells.
Every term, FeeSaver against TR Energy
| Package | FeeSaver (TRX) | TR Energy (TRX) | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65k · 15 minutes | ≈ 2.58 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 1 hour | 2.73 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 1 day | ≈ 3.74 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 3 days | ≈ 7.88 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 15 minutes | ≈ 5.16 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 1 hour | ≈ 5.46 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 1 day | ≈ 7.48 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 3 days | ≈ 15.76 | — | FeeSaver only |
≈ — estimated from market ratios, not a quoted price.
Live prices as of 2026-10-24 02:29 UTC.
So which is cheaper, FeeSaver or TR Energy?
Compare them on the packages both of them do price — the table below carries every one, and marks the cells that are our estimate.
Price is the only thing this board ranks on, so with the two level it has nothing further to say about FeeSaver against TR Energy. The sections below are facts, not a score.
Where FeeSaver and TR Energy sit on the whole board
TR Energy did not report a price for 65k energy for one hour in the latest scan, so it cannot be placed on the board at that package.
Both of those positions rest on prices FeeSaver and TR Energy publish themselves, not on anything this board has inferred, and both move whenever any other platform changes its rate.
What the archive has on FeeSaver and TR Energy
Over the 363 scans in which both quoted 65k energy for one hour, TR Energy was the cheaper of the two on every single one. The lead never changed hands.
The average distance between them while both were quoting was 0.25 TRX. The widest it opened was 0.25 TRX, at 2026-10-21 08:00 UTC. Neither price moved in that window: FeeSaver held 2.73 TRX at every one of the 620 scans and TR Energy held 2.48 TRX at every one of the 364 scans, which is why the gap above is the same number from end to end.
None of that is a trend. The board has been recording since 2026-09-24 02:00 UTC, every 15 minutes, and the archive behind this page is 720 hours of data so far. It is long enough to say what FeeSaver and TR Energy did yesterday and too short to say what either of them usually does.
What separates FeeSaver from TR Energy
The two do not sell the same ladder. FeeSaver publishes one hour prices; TR Energy publishes no price of its own that we can read. In practice FeeSaver quotes one hour where TR Energy does not, so 7 of the ten rows above are inferred for FeeSaver and 0 for TR Energy.
Neither FeeSaver nor TR Energy publishes an order size limit that our scraper can read, so the order limits table that appears on some head to head pages is absent from this one.
Our scraper carries a note against TR Energy that changes how its column should be read: “The board could not read a price from TR Energy in the latest scan, and our scraper did not say why. That is our side, not theirs.” That is why the TR Energy figure beside FeeSaver is the one it charges anyone walking up, not the lowest number it advertises.
Both FeeSaver and TR Energy pay us a commission when someone signs up through our link, which is why the two buttons at the foot of this page are marked as sponsored. It buys neither of them a place on the board.
FeeSaver carries a Telegram bot and TR Energy does not. Both of them run a public API and automatic top-ups.
Features
| Feature | FeeSaver | TR Energy |
|---|---|---|
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram | Yes | No |
| Auto-topup | Yes | Yes |
Order limits
Go to
Our links to FeeSaver and TR Energy are referral links: they pay us, you pay the same price.