FeeSaver vs iTRX
At 65k energy for one hour iTRX undercuts FeeSaver by 17%, a gap of 0.46 TRX. Every price on this page comes from our own scan of FeeSaver and iTRX, and the tables refresh from the newest scan as the page opens.
Every term, FeeSaver against iTRX
| Package | FeeSaver (TRX) | iTRX (TRX) | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65k · 15 minutes | ≈ 2.58 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 1 hour | 2.73 | 2.27 | iTRX −17% |
| 65k · 1 day | ≈ 3.74 | 6.50 | FeeSaver ≈−42% |
| 65k · 3 days | ≈ 7.88 | 12.68 | FeeSaver ≈−38% |
| 130k · 15 minutes | ≈ 5.16 | — | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 1 hour | ≈ 5.46 | 4.58 | iTRX ≈−16% |
| 130k · 1 day | ≈ 7.48 | 13.10 | FeeSaver ≈−43% |
| 130k · 3 days | ≈ 15.76 | 25.55 | FeeSaver ≈−38% |
≈ — estimated from market ratios, not a quoted price.
Live prices as of 2026-10-24 02:29 UTC.
So which is cheaper, FeeSaver or iTRX?
Take the one hour package and the answer is iTRX, 2.27 TRX against 2.73 TRX, which is 17 less. Take a longer rental and the answer changes hands between FeeSaver and iTRX, which is why the table above prints every term rather than one headline.
Price is the only thing this board ranks on, and 17% is a thin margin to choose on, so the rest of this page sets out what else separates FeeSaver from iTRX without scoring either of them.
Where FeeSaver and iTRX sit on the whole board
FeeSaver sits 10th and iTRX 4th among the 19 platforms with a price for 65k energy for one hour. Neither position is fixed, and 6 places is easily covered by one platform changing its rate.
Both of those positions rest on prices FeeSaver and iTRX publish themselves, not on anything this board has inferred, and both move whenever any other platform changes its rate.
What the archive has on FeeSaver and iTRX
Over the 620 scans in which both quoted 65k energy for one hour, iTRX was the cheaper of the two on every single one. The lead never changed hands.
The average distance between them while both were quoting was 0.46 TRX. The widest it opened was 0.46 TRX, at 2026-10-24 02:15 UTC. Neither price moved in that window: FeeSaver held 2.73 TRX at every one of the 620 scans and iTRX held 2.27 TRX at every one of the 621 scans, which is why the gap above is the same number from end to end.
None of that is a trend. The board has been recording since 2026-09-24 02:00 UTC, every 15 minutes, and the archive behind this page is 720 hours of data so far. It is long enough to say what FeeSaver and iTRX did yesterday and too short to say what either of them usually does.
What separates FeeSaver from iTRX
The two do not sell the same ladder. FeeSaver publishes one hour prices; iTRX publishes one hour, one day and three day prices. In practice iTRX quotes one day and three day where FeeSaver does not, so 7 of the ten rows above are inferred for FeeSaver and 0 for iTRX.
iTRX is the one of the two that states its order limits: a floor of 12,000 energy, a ceiling of 200,000,000 energy and a pool cap of 3,150,514 energy. FeeSaver publishes no minimum and no maximum we can read, so the size of order it will take is not something this page can tell you.
Both FeeSaver and iTRX pay us a commission when someone signs up through our link, which is why the two buttons at the foot of this page are marked as sponsored. It buys neither of them a place on the board.
FeeSaver carries a Telegram bot and automatic top-ups and iTRX does not. Both of them run a public API.
Features
| Feature | FeeSaver | iTRX |
|---|---|---|
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram | Yes | No |
| Auto-topup | Yes | No |
Order limits
| Limit | FeeSaver | iTRX |
|---|---|---|
| Minimum order | no limit stated | 12,000 energy |
| Maximum order | no limit stated | 200,000,000 energy |
| Platform pool cap | no limit stated | 3,150,514 energy |
Go to
Our links to FeeSaver and iTRX are referral links: they pay us, you pay the same price.