CatFee vs FeeSaver
The two are a long way apart at 65k energy for one hour: CatFee is 52% below FeeSaver, which is 1.43 TRX on one rental. Every price on this page comes from our own scan of CatFee and FeeSaver, and the tables refresh from the newest scan as the page opens.
Every term, CatFee against FeeSaver
| Package | CatFee (TRX) | FeeSaver (TRX) | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| 65k · 15 minutes | — | ≈ 2.58 | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 1 hour | 1.30 | 2.73 | CatFee −52% |
| 65k · 1 day | — | ≈ 3.74 | FeeSaver only |
| 65k · 3 days | — | ≈ 7.88 | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 15 minutes | — | ≈ 5.16 | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 1 hour | 2.60 | ≈ 5.46 | CatFee ≈−52% |
| 130k · 1 day | — | ≈ 7.48 | FeeSaver only |
| 130k · 3 days | — | ≈ 15.76 | FeeSaver only |
≈ — estimated from market ratios, not a quoted price.
Live prices as of 2026-10-24 02:29 UTC.
So which is cheaper, CatFee or FeeSaver?
On price for 65k energy for one hour, use CatFee. It asks 1.30 TRX where FeeSaver asks 2.73 TRX, a saving of 1.43 TRX per rental, and the same order holds at every other package CatFee and FeeSaver both quote.
Price is the only thing this board ranks on. A gap of 52% is a gap in TRX and nothing else, and it says nothing about how CatFee or FeeSaver handle an order that goes wrong.
Where CatFee and FeeSaver sit on the whole board
Out of the 19 platforms quoting 65k energy for one hour in the latest scan, CatFee comes joint 1st and FeeSaver comes 10th. That is 9 places of the board between them, and everything in that space is a platform this page does not cover.
Both of those positions rest on prices CatFee and FeeSaver publish themselves, not on anything this board has inferred, and both move whenever any other platform changes its rate.
What the archive has on CatFee and FeeSaver
Across 619 scans with a price from both at 65k energy for one hour, CatFee was in front 553 times and FeeSaver 66 times, with 98 changes of lead in between.
The average distance between them while both were quoting was 1.18 TRX. The widest it opened was 1.69 TRX, at 2026-10-23 07:45 UTC. The movement was one sided: CatFee moved 124 times, between 1.04 and 3.60 TRX and FeeSaver held 2.73 TRX at every one of the 620 scans.
None of that is a trend. The board has been recording since 2026-09-24 02:00 UTC, every 15 minutes, and the archive behind this page is 720 hours of data so far. It is long enough to say what CatFee and FeeSaver did yesterday and too short to say what either of them usually does.
What separates CatFee from FeeSaver
CatFee and FeeSaver quote the same terms but not at the same sizes. FeeSaver puts a real number against 65k energy only, so its 130k column is worked out from market ratios, while CatFee publishes both sizes. That is seven inferred rows for FeeSaver against no for CatFee.
Neither CatFee nor FeeSaver publishes an order size limit that our scraper can read, so the order limits table that appears on some head to head pages is absent from this one.
One of these two pays us and the other does not: our FeeSaver link is a referral link, our CatFee link is a plain one. The prices are read the same way for both, and CatFee outranking FeeSaver on this page would cost us money without changing a line of it.
Away from price the two are built differently. CatFee has a dApp; FeeSaver has a Telegram bot. Which of those matters is a question about your integration, not about the rate.
Features
| Feature | CatFee | FeeSaver |
|---|---|---|
| API | Yes | Yes |
| Telegram | No | Yes |
| Auto-topup | Yes | Yes |
| dApp | Yes | No |
Order limits
Go to
Our link to FeeSaver is a referral link: they pay us, you pay the same price. CatFee pays us nothing.